<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>ProIuris</title>
  <link>https://proiuris.org/</link>
  <description>Expert Insight on Law, Compliance &amp; Governance</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 16:15:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://proiuris.org/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>Caught Between Two Mandates: How Corporate Boards Are Managing ESG&#039;s Fractured Legal Landscape</title>
    <link>https://proiuris.org/corporate-boards-esg-conflicting-state-federal-mandates-2024/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://proiuris.org/corporate-boards-esg-conflicting-state-federal-mandates-2024/</guid>
    <description>As the SEC advances mandatory climate disclosure rules and progressive states codify ESG reporting requirements, a growing bloc of Republican-led states has enacted legislation restricting ESG-driven investment practices. For general counsels and board compliance officers, the resulting regulatory tension is not merely political theater—it carries real fiduciary and legal consequences that demand a structured, jurisdiction-aware response.</description>
    <author>ProIuris</author>
    <category>Corporate Governance</category>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 16:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>